More

    Unpacking the Eternal Appeal of the Jane Austen Adaptation

    Image may contain Gwyneth Paltrow Person Flower Flower Arrangement Flower Bouquet Plant Adult Face and Head
    Photo: ©Miramax/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Just over 250 years since the birth of Jane Austen, the razor-sharp 18th-century novelist’s influence over popular culture shows no signs of waning. Earlier this year, the BBC’s The Other Bennet Sister—not strictly an Austen adaptation, but based on Janice Hadlow’s book of the same name, which was in turn inspired by Pride and Prejudice—became a word-of-mouth sensation. And now, two more Regency romps are on their way: a new big-screen Sense and Sensibility from lauded indie director Georgia Oakley and starring Daisy Edgar-Jones, and a Netflix-produced Pride and Prejudice series from Dolly Alderton, centered on Emma Corrin’s Elizabeth Bennet.

    It begs the question: why? When filmmakers could be making something fresh and original, why are they still gravitating towards these centuries-old source materials? Well, the truth is, in a film and TV industry under increasing financial pressures and generally wary of taking risks on new ideas, a Jane Austen adaptation is still perceived as a safe bet—familiar IP, which producers will green light instantly. Why, then, haven’t audiences tired of it? The answer, I think, is because they’re just so much fun.

    They feel just right for right now—intimate, laid-back, and, crucially, spearheaded by women behind the camera—but also have everything we have always wanted and will continue to want from Jane Austen adaptations: joyous depictions of sisterhood; irresistible, will-they-won’t-they romances; exquisitely detailed world-building; and the guarantee of a happy ending. In a very uncertain world, that is, surely, a precious commodity.

     

    Latest articles

    spot_imgspot_img

    Related articles